The Functions of EphA1 Receptor Tyrosine Kinase in Several Tumors.

BACKGROUND: Eph receptors tyrosine kinase (RTK) were identified in 1987 from hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines and were the largest known subfamily of RTK. Eph receptors can be divided into two categories, EphA and EphB, based on their structure and receptor-ligand specificity. EphA can be divided into 10 species (EphA 1-10) and EphB into 6 species (EphB1-6). Similarly, the ligands of Eph receptors are Ephrins. Ephrins also can be divided into Ephrin A and Ephrin B, of which there are five species(Ephrin-A1-5) and three species(Ephrin-B1-3). Among the Eph receptors, EphA1 has been the least studied so far. As far as we know, Eph receptors are involved in multiple pathologies, including cancer progression, tumor angiogenesis, intestinal environmental stability, the lymph node system, neurological disease, and inhibition of nerve regeneration after injury. There is a link between EphA1, integrin and ECM- related signal pathways. Ephrin-A1 is a ligand of the EphA1 receptor. EphA1 and ephrin-A1 functions are related to tumor angiogenesis. EphA1 and ephrin-A1 also play roles in gynecological diseases. Ephrin-A1 and EphA1 receptors regulate the follicular formation, ovulation, embryo transport, implantation and placental formation, which are of great significance for the occurrence of gynecological tumor diseases. EphA1 has been identified as an oncoprotein in various tumors and has been associated with the prognosis of various tumors in recent years. EphA1 is considered a driver gene in tumor genomics. There are significant differences in EphA1 expression levels in different types of normal tissues and tumors and even in different stages of tumor development, suggesting its functional diversity. Changes at the gene level in cell biology are often used as biological indicators of cancer, known as biomarkers, which can be used to provide diagnostic or prognostic information and are valuable for improving the detection, monitoring and treatment of tumors. However, few prognostic markers can selectively predict clinically significant tumors with poor prognosis. These malignancies are more likely to progress and lead to death, requiring more aggressive treatment. Currently available treatments for advanced cancer are often ineffective, and treatment options are mainly palliative. Therefore, early identification and treatment of those at risk of developing malignant tumors are crucial. Although pieces of evidence have shown the role of EphA1 in tumorigenesis and development, its specific mechanism is still unknown to a great extent. OBJECTIVE: This review reveals the changes and roles of EphA1 in many tumors and cancers. The change of EphA1 expression can be used as a biological marker of cancer, which is valuable for improving tumor detection, monitoring and treatment and can be applied to imaging. Studies have shown that structural modification of EphA1 could make it an effective new drug. EphA1 is unique in that it can be considered a prognostic marker in many tumors and is of important meaning for clinical diagnosis and operative treatment. At the same time, the study of the specific mechanism of EphA1 in tumors can provide a new way for targeted therapy. METHODS: Relevant studies were retrieved and collected through the PubMed system. After determining EphA1 as the research object, by analyzing research articles on EphA1 in the PubMed system in recent 10 years, we found that EphA1 was closely connected with the occurrence and development of tumors and further determined the references according to the influencing factors for review and analysis. RESULTS: EphA1 has been identified as a cancer protein in various tumors, such as hepatocellular carcinoma, nasopharyngeal carcinoma, ovarian cancer, gastric cancer, colorectal cancer, clear cell renal cell carcinoma, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, breast cancer, prostate cancer and uveal melanoma. EphA1 is abnormally expressed in these tumor cells, which mainly plays a role in cancer progression, tumor angiogenesis, intestinal environmental stability, the lymph node system, nervous system diseases and gynecological diseases. In a narrow sense, EphA1 is especially effective in breast cancer in terms of gynecological diseases. However, the specific mechanism of EphA1 leading to the change of cancer cells in some tumors is not clear, which needs further research and exploration. CONCLUSION: RTK EphA1 can be used as a biomarker for tumor diagnosis (especially a prognostic marker), an indispensable therapeutic target for new anti-tumor therapies, and a novel anti-tumor drug.

Expression Pattern and Prognostic Value of EPHA/EFNA in Breast Cancer by Bioinformatics Analysis: Revealing Its Importance in Chemotherapy.

The activities of the ephrin family in breast cancer (BrCa) are complex. Family A receptors (EPHA) and ligands (EFNA) can act as oncogenes or tumor suppressors and are implicated in chemoresistance. Here, we examined the expression pattern and prognostic value of the EPHA/EFNA family in patients with breast cancer, including patients with different subtypes or different chemotherapy cohorts. In the UALCAN database, the mRNA expression of EPHA1, EPHA10, EFNA1, EFNA3, and EFNA4 was significantly higher, whereas that of EPHA2, EPHA4, EPHA5, and EFNA5 was significantly lower in breast cancer tissues than in paracancerous tissues. The transcriptional levels of EPHA/EFNA family members were correlated with intrinsic subclasses of breast cancer. The relationship between EPHA/EFNA and the clinicopathological parameters of BrCa was analyzed using bc-GenExMiner V4.5. EPHA1, EPHA2, EPHA4, EPHA7, EFNA3, EFNA4, and EFNA5 were upregulated in estrogen receptor- (ER-) and progesterone receptor- (PR-) negative tumors, whereas EPHA3, EPHA6, and EFNA1 were upregulated in ER- and PR-positive tumors. EPHA1, EPHA2, EFNA3, and EFNA4 mRNA expression was significantly higher in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2- (HER2-) positive tumors than in HER2-negative tumors. Triple-negative status was positively correlated with EPHA1, EPHA2, EPHA4, EPHA7, EFNA3, EFNA4, and EFNA5 and negatively correlated with EPHA3 and EPHA10 mRNA expression. Genetic alterations of EPHA/EFNA in breast cancer varied from 1.1% to 10% for individual genes, as determined by the cBioPortal database. The Kaplan-Meier plotter indicated that high EphA7 mRNA expression was associated with poor overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS), especially in the HER2 and luminal A subtypes. EFNA4 was predicted to have poor OS and RFS in breast cancers, especially in luminal B, basal-like subtype, and patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. High EPHA3 expression was significantly associated with better OS and RFS, especially in the luminal A subtype, but with poor RFS in BrCa patients receiving chemotherapy. Our findings systematically elucidate the expression pattern and prognostic value of the EPHA/EFNA family in BrCa, which might provide potential prognostic factors and novel targets in BrCa patients, including those with different subtypes or treated with chemotherapy.

Eph receptors and their ligands: promising molecular biomarkers and therapeutic targets in prostate cancer.

Although at present, there is a high incidence of prostate cancer, particularly in the Western world, mortality from this disease is declining and occurs primarily only from clinically significant late stage tumors with a poor prognosis. A major current focus of this field is the identification of new biomarkers which can detect earlier, and more effectively, clinically significant tumors from those deemed "low risk", as well as predict the prognostic course of a particular cancer. This strategy can in turn offer novel avenues for targeted therapies. The large family of Receptor Tyrosine Kinases, the Ephs, and their binding partners, the ephrins, has been implicated in many cancers of epithelial origin through stimulation of oncogenic transformation, tumor angiogenesis, and promotion of increased cell survival, invasion and migration. They also show promise as both biomarkers of diagnostic and prognostic value and as targeted therapies in cancer. This review will briefly discuss the complex roles and biological mechanisms of action of these receptors and ligands and, with regard to prostate cancer, highlight their potential as biomarkers for both diagnosis and prognosis, their application as imaging agents, and current approaches to assessing them as therapeutic targets. This review demonstrates the need for future studies into those particular family members that will prove helpful in understanding the biology and potential as targets for treatment of prostate cancer.

Origin of neomuscularized vessels in mice exposed to chronic hypoxia.

Exposure of mice to chronic hypoxia is one of the most often used animal models to study pulmonary hypertension. Hypoxia exposure leads to vascular remodeling and muscularization of the small parenchymal vessels in the lung. Due to the anatomical differences between mice and humans, it is not possible to determine whether the remodeled vessels originate from the arterial or venous side of the vasculature. By applying antibodies against specific marker molecules expressed by arterial (ephrinB2) and venous (EphB4) endothelial cells, we could show that remodeled parenchymal vessels in hypoxia-exposed mice are mostly of arterial origin with slight venous involvement. Using these tools, it is possible to further characterize remodeled vessels in other small animal models, such as transgenic or knockout mice. Particularly useful applications would include selection of parenchymal vessels for laser microdissection studies.

The role of Eph receptors and ephrin ligands in colorectal cancer.

Eph receptors and their ephrin ligands constitute the largest subfamily of receptor tyrosine kinases and are components of the cell signaling pathways involved during development. Eph and ephrin overexpression have been documented in a variety of human cancers including gastrointestinal malignancies and in particular colorectal malignancies. EphB and ephrin B proteins have been implicated in the homeostasis of the gastrointestinal tract where EphB2- and EphB3-ephrin B signaling regulates cell sorting in the mature epithelium. These proteins are also reported to be upregulated in colon carcinomas. The EphA/ephrin A system has also been implicated in epithelial tissue structure and function. More recently, EphA receptors and their corresponding ligands have been implicated in numerous malignancies. Of these, EphA2 in particular has been intensively investigated and has been proposed as a therapeutic target. An interesting observation emerging from these studies is the role for Ephs and ephrins in critical aspects of cell adhesion, migration and positioning, and a crucial role in tumor progression and metastasis. However, the underlying role of Ephs and ephrins in these processes has generally been studied on individual Eph or ephrin genes. Given the multiplicity of Eph expression on gut epithelial cells, a more global approach is needed to define the precise role of Eph-ephrin interaction in malignant transformation. Here, we will review the recent advances on the role of Eph-ephrin signaling in colorectal malignancies.

Expression of ephrin in retinal neovascularization and iris rubeosis.

We investigated expression of ephrin-B2 and Eph-B4 in the retinal tissues of six primate eyes with neovascularization and iris rubeosis secondary to laser-induced central retinal vein occlusion and in tissue from 10 human eyes with proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Two primate eyes with rubeosis and retinal neovascularization were enucleated 1, 2 and 4 weeks after the creation of central retinal vein occlusion. Antibodies were localized using the avidin-biotin reaction. In the primate eyes, ephrin-B2 was negative at I week and positive at 2 and 4 weeks in the rubeotic tissue, but was positive only at 2 weeks in the retinal neovascular membrane. Eph-B4 was negative in all the primate eye specimens. In the human tissue, ephrin-B2 was detected in two of the five eyes with rubeosis and three of the five eyes with retinal neovascularization. These data suggest that ephrin-B2 is a key regulator of neovascularization.

Ephrin A/EphA controls the rostral turning polarity of a lateral commissural tract in chick hindbrain.

Most post-crossing commissural axons turn into longitudinal paths to make synaptic connections with their targets. Mechanisms that control their rostrocaudal turning polarity are still poorly understood. We used the hindbrain as a model system to investigate the rostral turning of a laterally located commissural tract, identified as the caudal group of contralateral cerebellar-projecting second-order vestibular neurons (cC-VC). We found that the caudal hindbrain possessed a graded non-permissive/repulsive activity for growing cC-VC axons. This non-permissiveness/repulsion was in part mediated by glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored ephrin A. We further demonstrated that ephrin A2 was distributed in a caudal-high/rostral-low gradient in the caudolateral hindbrain and cC-VC axons expressed EphA receptors. Finally, perturbing ephrin A/EphA signalling both in vitro and in vivo led to rostrocaudal pathfinding errors of post-crossing cC-VC axons. These results suggest that ephrin A/EphA interactions play a key role in regulating the polarity of post-crossing cC-VC axons as they turn into the longitudinal axis.

Expression profile of Eph receptors and ephrin ligands in human skin and downregulation of EphA1 in nonmelanoma skin cancer.

Eph receptors and ephrin ligands represent the largest family of receptor tyrosine kinases. Beyond their well-defined meaning in developmental processes, these molecules also have important functions in adult human tissues and cancer. However, the Eph/ephrin expression profile in human skin is only marginally studied. We therefore investigated the mRNA expression of 21 Eph receptors and ephrin ligands in adult human skin in comparison to 13 other adult human tissues using quantitative real-time RT-PCR. In addition, immunohistochemistry was established for some members (EphA1, EphA2 and EphA7) to confirm the results of the RT-PCR and to identify the expressing cells in the skin. We found all investigated family members expressed in human skin, but at highly varying levels. EphA1, EphB3 and ephrin-A3 turned out to be most prominently expressed in skin compared to other adult human tissues. EphA1 was exclusively expressed in the epidermis. We therefore investigated the expression of EphA1 in nonmelanoma skin cancers derived from the epidermis (56 basal cell carcinomas and 32 squamous cell carcinomas). As demonstrated by immunohistochemistry, both skin cancers displayed a significant downregulation of EphA1 compared to the normal epidermis. In squamous cell carcinoma, the EphA1 downregulation was associated with increased tumor thickness, although this was not significant. Our results indicate that Eph receptors and ephrin ligands are widely expressed in the adult human skin, particularly in the epidermis, and may play an important role in skin homeostasis. EphA1 seems to be a marker of the differentiated normal epidermis and its downregulation in nonmelanoma skin cancer may contribute to carcinogenesis of these very frequent human tumors. EphA1 represents a new potential prognostic marker and therapeutic target in nonmelanoma skin cancer.